Signals captured
Filing posture from GSTN. Payment behaviour from AP. Concentration from spend. Dispute history from open disputes and resolved ones. Each signal updates daily.
Vendor Management | Vendor Risk Scoring
Composite score across four dimensions: filing posture (GSTR-1 / 3B on time?), payment behaviour (do invoices match POs?), concentration (% of total AP), and dispute history. Weights configurable per organisation. Score updates nightly. The CFO sees risk before the cheque clears.
How it works
Filing posture from GSTN. Payment behaviour from AP. Concentration from spend. Dispute history from open disputes and resolved ones. Each signal updates daily.
Weighted composite. Default weights are 30/30/20/20 across the four dimensions. Adjustable per organisation to reflect risk appetite (e.g., higher concentration weight for treasury).
The score breakdown shows which signals pulled it up or down. CFO sees not just the number but why.
Score below threshold triggers review (limit reduction, payment hold, vendor outreach). The action is logged on the vendor record.
What the system does
| Capability | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Filing posture signal | GSTN filing history per vendor | On-time % over rolling 12 months |
| Payment behaviour signal | PO + bill + payment history | PO-bill match %, payment cycle |
| Concentration signal | Total AP per vendor / total AP | Concentration % per vendor |
| Dispute history signal | Open + resolved disputes | Dispute frequency and severity |
| Composite score | Four signals + weights | Score (0-100) updated nightly |
| Drivers view | Score breakdown | Signal-level contribution to score |
Filing posture signal
Payment behaviour signal
Concentration signal
Dispute history signal
Composite score
Drivers view
Compliance + integrations
The score history is preserved per vendor over time. CFO can show the auditor not just the current score but the trend, the drivers and the actions taken.
Regulations we work within
Section 134(5), Companies Act
Internal financial controls supported with vendor risk evidence.
Rule 11(g), Companies Act
Score history preserved in the audit trail.
Connects to
Vendor Risk Scoring FAQ
Defaults are 30/30/20/20 across filing, payment, concentration and disputes. CFO can adjust per organisation. Treasury teams often weight concentration higher (40-50%); operations teams weight payment behaviour higher (40-50%).
Yes. Manual override at the vendor record with a reason. Override is captured in the audit trail. The system continues to compute the underlying score for visibility, but the override drives the action.
Score requires at least 3 months of activity for stability. Before that, the vendor shows as "scoring in progress" with the partial signals visible (filing posture from GSTN can be available immediately).
It can. Configurable per organisation. Some teams use the score to drive auto-hold below a threshold; others use it as a CFO-facing dashboard only. The integration with the payment scheduler is opt-in.
More in Vendor Management
Bills, payments, contracts, performance and risk in one vendor view.
See Vendor MasterGSTIN (CBIC), PAN (CBDT), MSME (Udyam), Aadhaar (UIDAI) verified live.
See KYC VerificationOn-time delivery, quality acceptance, payment cycle. Alternates surfaced on score decline.
See Vendor Performance TrackingConnect your AP data, free. The four signals run overnight; the composite scores show up by morning. The CFO sees the bottom 10% before the next payment run.