Vendor Management | Vendor Risk Scoring
Vendor risk, scored nightly. From filing posture to dispute history.
Composite score across four dimensions: filing posture (GSTR-1 / 3B on time?), payment behaviour (do invoices match POs?), concentration (% of total AP), and dispute history. Weights configurable per organisation. Score updates nightly. The CFO sees risk before the cheque clears.
What the system does
Capability, input, output.
| Capability | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Filing posture signal | GSTN filing history per vendor | On-time % over rolling 12 months |
| Payment behaviour signal | PO + bill + payment history | PO-bill match %, payment cycle |
| Concentration signal | Total AP per vendor / total AP | Concentration % per vendor |
| Dispute history signal | Open + resolved disputes | Dispute frequency and severity |
| Composite score | Four signals + weights | Score (0-100) updated nightly |
| Drivers view | Score breakdown | Signal-level contribution to score |
-
Filing posture signal
- Input
- GSTN filing history per vendor
- Output
- On-time % over rolling 12 months
-
Payment behaviour signal
- Input
- PO + bill + payment history
- Output
- PO-bill match %, payment cycle
-
Concentration signal
- Input
- Total AP per vendor / total AP
- Output
- Concentration % per vendor
-
Dispute history signal
- Input
- Open + resolved disputes
- Output
- Dispute frequency and severity
-
Composite score
- Input
- Four signals + weights
- Output
- Score (0-100) updated nightly
-
Drivers view
- Input
- Score breakdown
- Output
- Signal-level contribution to score
Compliance + integrations
Vendor risk scoring, audit-aware.
The score history is preserved per vendor over time. CFO can show the auditor not just the current score but the trend, the drivers and the actions taken.
Regulations we work within
-
Section 134(5), Companies Act
Internal financial controls supported with vendor risk evidence.
-
Rule 11(g), Companies Act
Score history preserved in the audit trail.
Connects to
- GSTN Filing posture signal source
- Internal AP data Payment behaviour and dispute signals
Vendor Risk Scoring FAQ
What buyers ask.
How are the weights set?
Defaults are 30/30/20/20 across filing, payment, concentration and disputes. CFO can adjust per organisation. Treasury teams often weight concentration higher (40-50%); operations teams weight payment behaviour higher (40-50%).
Can we override the score for a strategic vendor?
Yes. Manual override at the vendor record with a reason. Override is captured in the audit trail. The system continues to compute the underlying score for visibility, but the override drives the action.
How long before a new vendor has a score?
Score requires at least 3 months of activity for stability. Before that, the vendor shows as "scoring in progress" with the partial signals visible (filing posture from GSTN can be available immediately).
Does the score affect payment scheduling?
It can. Configurable per organisation. Some teams use the score to drive auto-hold below a threshold; others use it as a CFO-facing dashboard only. The integration with the payment scheduler is opt-in.
More in Vendor Management
Related features
Vendor Master
Bills, payments, contracts, performance and risk in one vendor view.
See Vendor MasterKYC Verification
GSTIN (CBIC), PAN (CBDT), MSME (Udyam), Aadhaar (UIDAI) verified live.
See KYC VerificationVendor Performance Tracking
On-time delivery, quality acceptance, payment cycle. Alternates surfaced on score decline.
See Vendor Performance Tracking
See the risk scores on your top 100 vendors tonight.
Connect your AP data, free. The four signals run overnight; the composite scores show up by morning. The CFO sees the bottom 10% before the next payment run.